NCHEMS completed work on this project in multiple stages. These stages included a landscape analysis, comprehensive stakeholder engagement, model review, model redesign, and the development of a final recommendations report on model implementation and future funding approaches. During each stage of the project, NCHEMS consulted with IHL staff and reported updates to the IHL Board of Trustees.
To start the process, NCHEMS performed a landscape analysis of Mississippi’s IHL system. The data used in our analysis ranged from national to state-level sources, though NCHEMS mainly focused on state and institutional-level data vetted by the institutions and IHL. NCHEMS also engaged in extensive stakeholder outreach throughout the process, conducting interviews and in-person engagement during our tour of all eight IHL institutions. Overall, the major stakeholder groups we consulted included:
- IHL Trustees.
- State legislators.
- Institutional leaders.
- Students.
- Faculty.
- Staff.
- State workforce development leaders.
From our engagement process, we learned that all IHL institutions play a significant role in Mississippi, and that many students attend these institutions because of their proximity, programs, reputation, and regional significance. Drawing on the feedback from the engagement process, NCHEMS developed a goal statement that lays the groundwork for the future adoption of a new funding allocation framework that will work for all institutions in the state. NCHEMS then worked closely with IHL to develop a new model that included an updated performance component, with metrics focused on student outcomes and workforce development. Production of new workforce metrics required collaborations with external workforce and education data agencies for labor market and enrollment data that could be used to track graduate earnings. NCHEMS also introduced an innovative approach to performance funding by including a mechanism for Mississippi to meet foundational funding needs alongside performance incentives. This new approach allows a state to simultaneously prioritize performance funding while the state addresses historical funding gaps.